| Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: Correct references in scientific report?
 Posted: Nov 28, 2006 - 11:14 AM
|
|
New Member
Joined: Nov 28, 2006
Posts: 2
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Correct references in scientific report?
Posted: Nov 28, 2006 - 09:56 PM
|
|
QNX Master
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Posts: 97
|
|
Those "sys_arch" links go to our System Architecture guide, which we've published as a printed book (we're up to the sixth edition). If you're using version 6.2.1, you could refer to it like this:
QNX Software Systems. System Architecture, 4th ed., 2003
If you'd like a printed copy, talk to your sales rep. The part number for this edition is 001996 (but I don't know if we have any more copies left). |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Correct references in scientific report?
Posted: Nov 28, 2006 - 11:04 PM
|
|
New Member
Joined: Nov 28, 2006
Posts: 2
|
|
ah, perfect! Thank you!
a more reliable source for the data on the history part of the wikipedia page and these references could'nt get better! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: Correct references in scientific report?
Posted: Nov 29, 2006 - 02:27 PM
|
|
QNX Master
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
Posts: 97
|
|
You're welcome.
It occurred to me after posting that I should have included the name of the OS in the title:
QNX Neutrino RTOS System Architecture
to avoid confusion with the QNX 4 System Architecture guide. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2007 The PNphpBB Group
Credits |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
