Skip navigation.
Home
The QNX Community Portal

View topic - OW

OW

Read-only archive of qnx.qnx4 (General QNX4 Discussion Group) at inn.qnx.com

OW

Postby Aleksey Popov » Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:08 pm

I did not be able to find v11.0beta. On official site of QSSL it was
available short time for beta-testers only. Libs from v10.6 do not suit
for v11.0/Open Watcom.
If you may prompt where find this version I shall is much thanked.
Aleksey.
Aleksey Popov
 

Re: OW

Postby booBot » Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:12 pm

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:08:02 +0400, Aleksey Popov <popov@zhukovsky.net>
wrote:

Libs from v10.6 do not suit for v11.0/Open Watcom.
How did you discover that?

(It works for me.)

Tony.
booBot
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:07 pm

Re: OW

Postby Mario Charest » Tue Oct 17, 2006 6:40 pm

"Aleksey Popov" <popov@zhukovsky.net> wrote in message
news:4534FFE2.9040408@zhukovsky.net...
I did not be able to find v11.0beta. On official site of QSSL it was
available short time for beta-testers only. Libs from v10.6 do not suit for
v11.0/Open Watcom.

- The c lib works,

- The C++ doesn't ( I 'm not 100% sure about this) because it seems the name
mangling has changed.

If you may prompt where find this version I shall is much thanked.
Aleksey.
Mario Charest
 

Re: OW

Postby Aleksey Popov » Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:14 pm

Tony ÐÉÛÅÔ:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:08:02 +0400, Aleksey Popov <popov@zhukovsky.net
wrote:

Libs from v10.6 do not suit for v11.0/Open Watcom.
How did you discover that?
(It works for me.)

Tony.

I asked concretely about _int64 :) .

Libs 10.6 does not support long long (support of printf and so on not so
important, their also does not correctly support in the last Sybase
watcom11.0c for windows). But the next:
-------
long long lli = 0x8899AABBCCDDEEFF;
printf( "lli = 0x%8X%8X\n", (long)(lli>>32), (long)(lli&0xFFFFFFFF) );
-------
works proper with 11.0 libs, and don't linked with 10.6 libs.
From tst.map :
Module: C:\WATCOM\lib386\nt\clib3r.lib(i8s)
004010e2* __U8RS
004010fc __I8RS
00401117* __I8LS
00401117* __U8LS
Also don't work :
-------
double d;
unsigned long long ulli;
d = ulli;
-------
And so on.

From v11.0c clib3r.lst :
-------
i8s Offset=000001a0H
__I8LS
__I8RS
__U8LS
__U8RS

i8m Offset=00000290H
__I8M
__U8M

i8fd386 Offset=00000330H
__I8FD
__U8FD

i8fs386 Offset=00000440H
__I8FS
__U8FS

i8d Offset=00000550H
__I8D
__U8D
-------

Aleksey.
Aleksey Popov
 

Re: OW

Postby booBot » Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:22 pm

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:14:56 +0400, Aleksey Popov <popov@zhukovsky.net>
wrote:

Libs 10.6 does not support long long
Actually, it is "Slib32" lib's fault, not Watcom's.


But - there is hope: http://zinformatic.blogspot.com/

Tony.
booBot
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:07 pm

Re: OW

Postby Mario Charest » Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:11 pm

"Tony" <mts.spb.suxx@mail.ru> wrote in message
news:op.thpzcfd0o93ri4@mobile.wst.quantum.ru...
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:14:56 +0400, Aleksey Popov <popov@zhukovsky.net
wrote:

Libs 10.6 does not support long long
Actually, it is "Slib32" lib's fault, not Watcom's.

But - there is hope: http://zinformatic.blogspot.com/

Hey Alekey, it's not a secret anymore ;-)

Tony.
Mario Charest
 

Re: OW

Postby Aleksey Popov » Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:49 pm

But - there is hope: http://zinformatic.blogspot.com/

Hey Alekey, it's not a secret anymore ;-)

Hello Mario, I see.
Thank you for letter, has not haved time to answer from home, presently
i'm on work.
Aleksey.
Aleksey Popov
 

Re: OW

Postby booBot » Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:46 pm

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:11:01 +0400, Mario Charest <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Hey Alekey, it's not a secret anymore ;-)
Hello, Mario!

The windows OW v1.6RC1 blows too...

So, it's not your fault! :)
Hope the developer team will look into it - you would not be debugging the
compiler.

Tony.
booBot
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:07 pm

Re: OW

Postby Mario Charest » Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:05 pm

"Tony" <mts.spb.suxx@mail.ru> wrote in message
news:op.thp5z6ibo93ri4@mobile.wst.quantum.ru...
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:11:01 +0400, Mario Charest <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Hey Alekey, it's not a secret anymore ;-)
Hello, Mario!
The windows OW v1.6RC1 blows too...

So, it's not your fault! :)

Phew ;-)

Would you care to make a report on http://bugzilla.openwatcom.com/ ?

Hope the developer team will look into it - you would not be debugging the
compiler.

Tony.
Mario Charest
 

Re: OW

Postby booBot » Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:08 pm

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:05:38 +0400, Mario Charest <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

The windows OW v1.6RC1 blows too...
So, it's not your fault! :)
Phew ;-)
Would you care to make a report on http://bugzilla.openwatcom.com/ ?
I've mailed you the full post-mortal dump it gave out (do not worry, it's

just few lines! :) ).

Tony.
booBot
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:07 pm

Re: OW

Postby booBot » Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:25 pm

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:05:38 +0400, Mario Charest <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

Would you care to make a report on http://bugzilla.openwatcom.com/ ?
oops!

I missed by one! :D
The bug is #667.

Tony.
booBot
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:07 pm

Re: OW

Postby Mario Charest » Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:08 pm

"Tony" <mts.spb.suxx@mail.ru> wrote in message
news:op.thp7sks6o93ri4@mobile.wst.quantum.ru...
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:05:38 +0400, Mario Charest <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

Would you care to make a report on http://bugzilla.openwatcom.com/ ?
oops!
I missed by one! :D
The bug is #667.


I too had a bug, but with wpp this time. Crashes on both Windows/QNX4 ;-)
Bug 668 !

It's nice to see the Windows and QNX4 version behave so much alike, lol!

> Tony.
Mario Charest
 


Return to qnx.qnx4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron